
|
|
On May 10, 2001, after a brief illness, Maylie Scott, Roshi, died
peacefully at her home in Arcata, California. She was the
founding abbess of Rin Shin-ji, Forest Heart Soto Zen Temple, in
Arcata, Humboldt County, California. Her family was with her
during the last weeks of her illness.
Maylie was born March 29, 1935, grew up in New York City, and graduated
from Harvard University in 1956. She married the same year, and
after some travel, she and her family moved to Berkeley, California,
where she received a Masters degree in Social Work from UC,
Berkeley. Subsequently she worked for Alameda County Mental
Health as a therapist and administrator.
She began her study and practice of Zen Buddhism with Sojun, Roshi, Mel
Weitsman in 1971, was ordained a priest in 1988, and received full
transmission from him during a seven-day ceremony at Tassajara in
1998. Alan Senauke, her dharma brother, received transmission at
the same time. Maylie's dharma transmission name is Kushin
Seisho, Vast Mind, Clearly Shining. Maylie called Sojun Roshi her
"root" teacher, but another of her teachers was Maurine Stuart,
Roshi. In the 1980âs Maurine came periodically from the East
Coast to lead women-only sesshin. Maylie was one of the women who
attended, and through those encounters, they became close friends.
In addition to her intense devotion to zazen, Maylie was a "devotedly
do" activist. She was on the Board of Directors of the Buddhist
Peace Fellowship, involved in anti-nuclear issues, a founder of and
mentor for BASE (Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement), and was
active both in Berkeley and Arcata in prisoner advocacy work. She
had toured Pelican Bay Prison north of Arcata and had developed a
relationship with a prisoner there.
From 1990 until 1998, Maylie, was the visiting teacher for the Arcata
Zen Group. She came up every other month from Berkeley to conduct
sesshin, to begin a BASE group, and to encourage our practice as well
as to give greater structure to our loosely knit group. In July
of 1999, she moved permanently into her home in Arcata and directed the
conversion of her garage into a zendo. Because she loved the
Redwood forests and walked almost daily in Arcata's nearby Redwood
Park, she named the zendo Rin Shin-ji, Forest Heart Temple.
In the month and weeks and days before her death, both while in the
hospital and at home, Maylie was surrounded by family, friends, and
students. After she was released from the hospital, she insisted
on seeing anyone and everyone who wanted to see her. A schedule
was set up for people to see her one by one for 10 or 15 minutes.
More formally family, students, and friends were invited into her room
four times a day to sit for 15 minutes and to chant the Heart
Sutra. Rose B., an RN and close disciple of Maylie's, directed
these gatherings. Family members always joined in. After
Sojun Roshi, Alan Senauke, and Mary Mocine, priest at the Vallejo Zen
Center, arrived, they too were present to support our sitting and
chanting.
Early in the week that Maylie died, it was decided that these sittings
and chanting should take place in the zendo. Some of Maylie's
students as well as Alan and Mary were sitting together at 4:15 on the
afternoon of May 10 when word came down from the house that Kushin
Seisho, Maylie Scott, Roshi, had died. After the family had spent
time with her, and Mel, Alan, and Mary had shaved her head and their
own, the rest of us went to her room where she lay in her robes,
covered with bright flowers. We crowded around her bed and stood
quietly for a time before ceremonies began in the flower filled,
candle-lit setting where so many of her students had had dokusan with
her.
Her body was then carried downstairs from her bedroom and placed in an
open, plain pine coffin, made by one of Maylie's longtime students, in
the living room. The coffin was then carried down to the
zendo. The ceremonies in the zendo, led by Sojun Roshi and
assisted by Mary and Alan, then began. All present had a
chance to ask questions of Sojun Roshi and to offer flowers and words
to Maylie. After some three hours, the thirty-five to forty
people present returned to Maylie's house for food and drink.
The following day at noon, Alan led the circumambulation of the coffin
as we chanted the names of the Buddha's and bodhisattvas. People
who had not been present the previous evening had a chance to speak to
or about Maylie. On Monday morning May 14, there was a last
gathering in the chapel in nearby Eureka where Maylie was
cremated. Like all the other ceremonies, it combined Buddhist and
Christian elements. It began with chanting of the Heart Sutra,
certainly Maylie's favorite, followed by recitation of the Enmei Jukku
Kannon Gyo. In the Soto Zen tradition, this is traditionally
chanted 21 times for 49 days for the deceased. Maylie had told
her students that she had done this for her and her sister's
mother. We at Rin Shin-ji are doing the same for Maylie.
After the chanting, Father Erik Duff of St. Albana's Episcopal Church
opened comments with a tribute to Maylie. While Maylie was at
home, he had administered the Eucharist to both her and Mother Mary
John (Maylie's sister), as well as to other members of the family, who attended St.
Alban's the three Sundays they were in Arcata. There followed a
vocal solo by her son John and comments by members of the family and by
some of Maylie's students and friends.
Near the end of the service, we read:
On the evening of Maylie's death, in response to a question, one of Sojun Roshi's teaching's was:
--Gael H.
So what do we do with our beliefs? I can't quite swallow the idea
that it is possible to have no beliefs. I think that all of us
have them, and they are diverse and not necessarily long-lasting
although they may be. And we really believe them and we can
become pretty attached to them and have pretty strong reactions when an
aspect of our belief system is challenged.
If you are somewhat familiar with the Heart Sutra, you can hear this
all being played out with the two bodhisattvas talking to one another,
Shariputra and Avalokiteshvara. Well, that's a belief, and that
can seem remote, irrelevant, or not. Then there is the difficult
stuff about form is emptiness and emptiness is form. That can be
dismissed as just too difficult, or it can be filed. What does
that mean? Then there is a long section about taking apart
everything - nothing: no teachings, no person, nothing, nothing.
Then the last section is this great BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, the drumbeat of
THIS IS THE GREAT MANTRA, THIS IS IT! So, what do we do with that?
So we all have, I believe, beliefs with which we operate, and the
question is how do we hold the beliefs and how do the beliefs help us
to connect with one another and the world? And how do we use the
beliefs so they don't separate us from experience? The teaching
is that we hold the beliefs somewhat lightly on the basis of prajna
paramita, this non-dual understanding.
I want to make rather an odd switch to a book I have just been reading,
Of Wolves and Men by Barry Lopez. He has spent a lot of time with
the Eskimo and a lot of time for this book in researching wolves.
He is noticing the way our culture looks at animals and the way people
who are largely unaffected by our culture look at animals.
There's a whole study of wolves that compiles behaviors and types, et
cetera, that gathers knowledge about wolf behavior and then makes
certain generalizations. This is very different from the way the
Eskimo live with the wolves, the way they consider them.
The wolf the Eskimo sees is a variable creature who does things because
he is a certain age, or because it is a warm day, or because he is
hungry. Everything depends on so many other things. Anagook
[that's the Eskimo word for wolf] may be a wolf with a family who hunts
with more determination than a yearling who has no family to
feed. He may be an old wolf alone on the tundra tossing a piece
of caribou hide in the air, running to catch it. He may be an
ill-tempered wolf who always tries to kill trespassing wolves wandering
in his territory , or he may be a wolf who toys with a red-backed mouse
in the morning and kills a moose in the afternoon.
Examine some of the [until recently] basic precepts of wild-life
science in the light of all this, such as that wolves kill primarily
the weak, the old, the injured. Too simple, say the Eskimo.
Temperature and humidity affect the wolf's and the
caribou's endurance. Terrain affects their ability to run.
For caribou and moose, the nearness of deep, open water is
important. With no water to get into, even the healthiest caribou
fall prey to the wolf because no caribou can outlast the wolf.
Then he begins to write about the correspondence, the identity between
the wolf and the Eskimo, how they both support themselves by hunting,
and they have to be very skillful and persistent and know how to
survive in the most extreme conditions.
I would like to suggest that there is a correspondence between the
worlds of these two hunters about which the reader should be both
open-minded and critical. I will not try to prove that primitive
hunting societies were socially or psychologically organized like
wolves that lived in the same environment although this may be close to
the truth.
What I am saying is this: we do not know very much at all about
animals. We cannot understand them except in terms of our own
needs and experiences, and to approach them solely in terms of the
Western imagination is really to deny the animal. It behooves us
to visit with the people with whom we share the planet and an interest
in wolves, but who themselves come from a different time-space, and who
- as far as we know - are very much closer to the wolf than we will
ever be.
What, if anything, does this correspondence mean? I think it can
mean almost anything if you are trying to fathom wolves. It
became clear to me one evening in a single question. An old
Eskimo man was asked who, at the end of his life, knew more about
mountains and foothills of the Brooks Range...an old man or an old
wolf? Where and when to hunt? How to survive a blizzard or
a year when the caribou didn't come?
After a pause, the man said, "The same. They are the same."
The remark has special meaning for what it implies about wolves.
It comes from a man who has had to negotiate in polar darkness and
whiteouts when the world surrounding him was entirely without the one
thing indispensable to the Western navigator, an edge.
Anthropologist Edmond Carpenter has written about the extraordinary
ability of polar Eskimo to find their way about in a world that is
often without horizon or actual points or objects of reference.
What the Eskimo perceives is relationships, clusters of information
that include what type of snow is under foot, the direction and sound
against a parka wrap of wind, any smells in the air, the contour of the
landscape, the movement of animals and so on.
By constantly processing this information, the Eskimo knows where he is
and where he is going. By implication, the Eskimo suggests that
the wolf does something similar.
So what do we do in this world that we have beliefs about, but
essentially we don't know. And sometimes there is a whiteout,
sometimes there is a blackout, and then what? It is said that the
Middle Way has no point of reference, so how do we find our grounding
in a place where there is no point of reference?
Moving on now to my own situation, I discovered on Friday that I have
quite an aggressive cancer, cancer of the colon metastasized to the
liver. So, blackout, and there is a great deal to take in.
I'm feeling okay; I'm feeling pain free and not too uncomfortable but
very weak. The weakness makes it natural to just be very slow and
close to the breaths as they come in and go out. I also feel that
I have had a wonderful life, and I don't need to hang on.
And we don't know. It could be quite soon; it could be not quite
so soon. So a very complex blizzard with so many of us involved
and so many really deep, heart connections. How can we be
together in this transition time? How can we open our hearts to
one another and learn? Great teaching. Greatest
teaching. Suzuki Roshi said, "Death is the best teacher."
How can we - in our individual ways and as a group - draw
together? And, of course, there is great sadness. There are
long, life-long relationships. It is good to be able to express
that, and I welcome - I really welcome - people calling and dropping
in. Actually, not dropping in but calling first. Of course,
everyone has been really supportive and helpful. Often when the
telephone rings, I get a little "Ah! Oh!" Someone is there so to
call, That's fine and to come and have a little visit, that's fine too,
and let's see what we make of this together.
I'd like to end by reading a short poem by Jane Hirshfield called "True."
May I be at ease in my body, feeling the ground beneath my seat and
feet, letting my back be long and straight, enjoying breath as it rises
and falls and rises.
May I know and be intimate with body mind, whatever its feeling or
mood, calm or agitated, tired or energetic, irritated or
friendly. Breathing in and out, in and out, aware, moment by
moment, of the risings and passings.
May I be attentive and gentle towards my own discomfort and suffering.
May I be attentive and grateful for my own joy and well-being.
May I move towards others freely and with openness.
May I receive others with sympathy and understanding.
May I move towards the suffering of others with peaceful and attentive confidence.
May I recall the Bodhisattva of compassion; her 1,000 hands, her
instant readiness for action. Each hand with an eye in it, the
instinctive knowing what to do.
May I continually cultivate the ground of peace for myself and others
and persist, mindful and dedicated to this work, independent of
results.
May I know that my peace and the world's peace are not separate; that
our peace in the world is a result of our work for justice.
May all beings be well, happy, and peaceful.
I shall paint the zendo door | ||
Sitting Schedule
Events
Regular Activities
Beginner's Handbook
Dharma Talks - Written
Dharma Talks - Audio
Voices
Teacher Search
Prison Sanghas
Local BPF
Work Practice
Maylie Scott
History
Newsletter
Donate
Contact Info
Guidelines
Links